HealthDay News — According to a study published in JAMA Internal Medicine, less than 20% of progress note content is entered manually by medical students, residents and direct care hospitalists.
Michael Wang, MD, from the University of California, San Francisco, and colleagues used a new electronic health record (EHR) tool to evaluate documentation practices by medical students, residents, and direct care hospitalists.
Using the EHR tool, they examined the provenance of every character to see whether it was typed fresh (manually entered), pulled in from another source (imported), or pasted from elsewhere (copied). A total of 23,630 inpatient progress notes written by 460 clinicians were analyzed over an 8-month period.
The researchers found that, compared with medical students or direct care hospitalists, residents manually entered less (11.8 versus 16.2 and 14.1% of the text, respectively) and copied more (51.4 versus 49.0 and 47.9%, respectively). Notes were shortest for direct care hospitalists (5006 characters) compared with medical students and residents (7053 and 6720 characters, respectively).
“Clinicians spend time every day writing progress notes,” the authors write. “Understanding their practice and the needs of their audience could spur improvements that restore the utility of this documentation.”
One author disclosed financial ties to Digital Health Innovation, and reported being the principal inventor of CareWeb.
Wang MD, Khanna R, Najafi N. “Characterizing the Source of Text in Electronic Health Record Progress Notes.” JAMA Intern Med. 2017. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1548 [Epub ahead of print]