When patients are able to articulate their beliefs, it can help them move from making what may have been an unconscious choice into a conscious one.
The American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology believe there is “no better time to review and take a fresh perspective on medical ethics and professionalism in the light of established norms and current stressors.”
For many health care professionals, successfully managing uncertainty means recognizing that surety is complicated and illusory and knowledge is iterative and provisional rather than definitive.
Whatever strategy you employ to encourage vaccinations, it is important to be respectful and empathize with your patient’s concerns and perspectives.
Meeting public demand for an urgently needed effective medication quickly and safely during a pandemic involves difficult tradeoffs.
Black patients were half as likely to receive remdesivir as White patients, according to researchers from the CCC19.
Putting information in the cloud can be a good move for a physician’s practice — but only if done well.
Physicians should frame treatment options by their “harms and benefits,” not by their “risks and benefits.”
A survey presented during ASCO20 found that patients who considered themselves adequately informed felt “in control” most days.
The American College of Physicians statement outlines how the “status quo” created health inequalities and prevented the spread of the COVID-19 virus, and outlines steps on how to move forward.
From an ethical perspective, disclosing adverse events to patients is predicated on the idea that physicians have obligations to tell the truth, but physicians may worry that apologizing will incur greater responsibility for liability.
African-American patients have an increased likelihood of hospitalization for COVID-19.
Housing insecurity is tied to an increased risk for developing albuminuria.
A study aimed to identify associations between Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment orders and intensive care measures in decedents with chronic ill-ness.
Guidelines on research ethics review vary significantly between countries, according to study data published in Health Research Policy and Systems.
As excitement grows around AI and the benefits it could have in healthcare, concerns remain about the technology’s pitfalls.
We make a promise to do good by our patients, but what does it mean to do harm? Should we include socioeconomic harm in this discussion?
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors is taking steps to identifying potential conflicts of interest through changes to a key form.
In the context of medical assistance in dying (MAiD), a framework allowing clinicians to communicate their ethical concerns may have benefits for both patients and providers.
Investigators explored concerns with regard to opioid prescribing in compliance with new regulations in a commentary piece.